Re join in Ashoka university
5 years ago
Dear sir
I am pratap sagar seth. I have worked as senior project manager (c) In Ashoka University Sonipat (Hr) since from May 1 , 2014 to Feb 15 2017. I have got my starting salary Rs- 90000\ p.m & last salary Rs- 110000\p.m in the favour of IFRE ( INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION). They have taken my resignation by forcefully by giving me torture. I have worked there 2years & 10 months . Now i am job less since from 1years & 8 months . I have tried my best for searching the job but in vain due to resection in construction work (civil engg ). My parents & children are all dependent on me. Now it is very difficult me to nourish them. But construction work is going in Ashoka University. Can i rejoin there by some legal documentation. Pls advice me.
Regards
pratap sagar seth
Deepak Yashwantrao Bade
Responded 5 years ago
I do understand about your case to some extent .But unless and until you share more information nothing can be said in concrete terms. Best thing for you would be to engage and Advocate through Vidhikarya.com who can handle your job properly.
You have already said about your starting salary and also increment which was good but I fail to understand why and all on a sudden the company asked you or forces you to quit. Normally employees with your pay pack range want to change and go up in the professional ladder and I do not understand why you want to stick to the company which did not show good attitude and you also do not need any change.
So, waiting for the additional information with regard to your contract.
Shanti Ranjan Behera,Advocate
ARPIT BATRA
Responded 5 years ago
ROBERT D ROZARIO
Responded 5 years ago
If it is private university approach labor commissioner under Section 12 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
12. Duties of conciliation officers.-
(1) Where any industrial dispute exists or is apprehended, the conciliation officer may, or where the dispute relates to a public utility service and a notice under section 22 has been given, shall hold conciliation proceedings in the prescribed manner.
(2) The conciliation officer shall, for the purpose of bringing about a settlement of the dispute, without delay, investigate the dispute and all matters affecting the merits and the right settlement thereof and may do all such things as he thinks fit for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to a fair and amicable settlement of the dispute.
(3) If a settlement of the dispute or of any of the matters in dispute is arrived at in the course of the conciliation proceedings the conciliation
officer shall send a report thereof to the appropriate Government 1 or an officer authorised in this behalf by the appropriate Government] together with a memorandum of the settlement signed by the parties to the dispute.
(4) If no such settlement is arrived at, the conciliation officer shall, as soon as practicable after the close of the investigation, send to the appropriate Government a full report setting forth the steps taken by him for ascertaining the facts and circumstances relating to the dispute and for bringing about a settlement thereof, together with a full statement of such facts and circumstances, and the reasons on account of which, in his opinion, a settlement could not be arrived at.
(5) If, on a consideration of the report referred to in sub- section (4), the appropriate Government is satisfied that there is a case for reference to a Board, 2 Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal,] it may make such reference. Where the appropriate Government does not make such a reference it shall record and communicate to the parties concerned its reasons therefor.
(6) A report under this section shall be submitted within fourteen days of the commencement of the conciliation proceedings or within such shorter period as may be fixed by the appropriate Government: 3 Provided that, 4 subject to the approval of the conciliation officer,] the time for the submission of the report may be extended by such period as may be agreed upon in writing by all the parties to the dispute.]
OR APPROACH THE HIGH COURT
Rajender Prasad
Responded 5 years ago