Age limit for Lawyers to be enrolled with Bar Council for Practice- Supreme Court quashes the rule limiting the age at 45 years.


Posted On : December 27, 2018
Listen to this article

Table of Contents

The Supreme Court of India quashed the petition by the Bar Councils wherein the Bar Councils wanted to impose an age limit of 45 years for enrolling as an Advocate to pursue the career of legal practitioner. The Bar Council argued that the rule was enacted to protect the interest of the Advocates and to ensure the upkeep of the professional standards. The Council also raised a point that it helped in maintaining the uniformity in the profession across the states. The Apex Court while deliberating on the matter observed, “How can this be done? Lot of people enroll as lawyers after retirement or after their resignation. In fact, I know about one person in Karnataka who was under suspension and he started practicing law. He turned out to be one of the best lawyers in the state. These things do happen." The Bench also observed that the Parliament did not fix any upper age limit for pursuing the LL.B. course and degree and therefore by restricting the degree holders with age more than 45 years, the State Bar Councils were differentiating between two similarly placed individuals. The Apex Court, negating all the arguments of the State Bar Councils quashed the rule and remarked that many persons above 45 years in age had excelled in the profession and the young lawyers had a lot to learn from them. The Learned Court stated, " We do not find any rationale to have age restriction for enrollment as lawyers if a person is otherwise eligible."

This judgement of the Apex Court is welcome step and this is going to make lot of people happy. This also opens up the door for those persons who have garnered lot of experience and wisdom which can be fruitfully employed and used in the legal world. Had this rule not been quashed then this would have meant a loss, may be a big loss, to the legal sector as lot of great experience and skills would not have been left unexploited. It has been seen that many of the lawyers who started practice after pursuing other professions have turned out to be good advocates as it is seen that the maturity and understanding of the work and law is better for them. Let's be grateful to the learned Court for keeping the door open for all those individuals who can be a good and great lawyers even if they start little late.

Written By:
Abhimanyu  Shandilya

Abhimanyu Shandilya


Recommended Free Legal Advices
question markPetition to increase or remove attempt cap from JEE when there is no age limit 1 Response(s)
Dear Client The Indian legal system does not bar someone from filing a case or writ petition as in your case here when there is sufficient ground to show to the court that someone is aggrieved due to such rule (age bar rule in this case). Just because one thinks it is not a good rule will not be good enough to file case. The case must be supported by cogent reasoning that why such rule should be challenged in court of law. One can not approach the court with arbitrary reasoning for the case. Try to build the case with all logical and proper reasoning the court will be bound to pay attention to your case.
question markDifferences in professionalist 2 Response(s)
Dear client, Rule 47 of Bar Council Of India Rules, provides that an advocate shall not personally engage in any business; but he may be a sleeping partner in a firm doing business provided that in the opinion of the appropriate State Bar Council, the nature of the business is not inconsistent with the dignity of the profession. Under Rule 49 of the Bar Council of India Rules, an advocate shall not be a full-time employee of any person, Government, firm, corporation or concern and on taking up such employment, shall intimate such fact to the Bar Council concerned and shall cease to practise as long as he is in such employment.
question markBASIC SALARY RULE PRIVATE SECTOR-AS PER MY CONDITION 3 Response(s)
Dear Client, APP APNE PAS RAKHA HUA SAB KAGAJ, DASTABEJ, PAY SLIPS, BANK STATEMENT AUR AGAR APPOINTMENT LETTER HAI TO USKI COPY LEKE STATE LABOUR DEPTT. OR LABOUR COMMISSIONER POUCHE AUR EK COMPLAINT DARJ KIJIYE COMPANY KE BIPAKSH. APKA JO VI SIKAYAT HAI OH ADHIKARIK KO BATAYEY. APP APNI SIKAYAT PATRA LABOUR COURT ME DAKHIL KAR SEKTE HAI. KOI ACHHA OKIL JO LABOUR COURT ME PRACTICE KARTE HAI USSE BAT KIJIYE
question markPromotion method has been changed in Recruitment Rule 4 Response(s)
Dear Sir, If you are aggrieved by such method which is causing loss in your future career then approach the Service Tribunal or High Court to set right the anomalies and thus you will get justice definitely. Rate me Five Star*