Litigation and Arbitration: Key Similarities and Differences Explained


Posted On : February 8, 2023
Litigation and Arbitration: Key Similarities and Differences Explained
Ubi Jus Ibi Remedium - Where there is a right, there is a remedy. The entire legal system thrives for upholding such rights through exploring the appropriate remedies available. For that purpose, litigation and arbitration practice both have their own importance. While the former is known to all for the purpose of dispute resolution, the latter still limits recognition in the commerce sector.
Listen to this article

Table of Contents

When it comes to the traditional method of seeking justice in India, litigation is the way out. It is usually identified by advocates representing before the courts the facts of the matter as per their own clients. Supporting evidence is produced by the respective parties before the court. The presiding officer, i.e. the judge takes into consideration whatever is presented before him/ her in form of statements, evidence, documents, etc., and decides the case based on applicable laws.

 

On the other hand, people are not much aware of the methods of alternate dispute resolution (ADR). They may figure out through the terminology, but they do not possess the exact idea of what it actually is and how it helps resolve disputes with more convenience. More or less, this lack of knowledge is also one of the many reasons people opt for traditional litigation rather than going for arbitration or any other mode of ADR. 

If we seek to understand, litigation and arbitration are examples of rights-oriented processes. Arbitration is an out-of-court process for deciding disputes through a third party appointed by parties at dispute. Here on this page, there are similarities between arbitration and litigation, and there are concrete differences as well which alienate the two methods of dispute resolution. 

 

Difference Between Litigation and Arbitration

The table below focuses upon the various aspects come across during resolution of disputes, and the specificity under traditional litigation as well as the practical arbitral proceedings. Each of them is taken up and the characteristics defining arbitration or typical court proceedings have been explained hereunder.

 

Six Key Differences Between Litigation and Arbitration

Particulars

Litigation

Arbitration

Procedure

Litigation is a public procedure unless in-camera proceedings are sought (for very specific matters)

Arbitration proceedings are confidential and private in nature conducted at a place arranged and agreed upon by the parties themselves 

Deciding Authority

A judge is not appointed by parties’ choice

An arbitrator is usually appointed with confirmation from both the parties

Formalities

The court process involves various procedural formalities, whose absence may affect the interests of parties. Examples include payment of court fees, jurisdictional courts, etc.

Arbitration does not involve any strict procedure, provided that the principles of natural justice are duly followed - Everyone is given a chance to be heard, the decision maker is not biased, etc. 

Appeal

Appeals, revision or review is allowed against the decisions of courts

Challenge against arbitration award is allowed in limited circumstances

Costs and Time

Litigation is an expensive and time consuming affair

As compared to traditional litigation, arbitration is less expensive and can be wrapped sooner

Law

Procedural laws like CrPC, CPC are the major statutes governing the process under litigation

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 governs process and rules to be followed by parties and arbitrator during arbitral proceedings



Similarities Between Arbitration and Litigation

Since the difference between litigation and arbitration is clear by now, there is some need to understand what makes them seek the same end result - decision in a legal dispute. In both situations, one party wins while the other loses. Hence, the common features which make litigation as well as arbitral proceedings look alike.

 

Tabular Depiction of Factors Connecting the Dots of Litigation - Arbitration

Particulars

Similarity

Aim

Both litigation and arbitration focus upon resolution of disputes upholding some legal rights of the parties. 

Tools

The main aspect in a dispute to be resolved is the applicable laws based on the matter in hand.

Representation

While litigants require lawyers with expertise in specific matters to represent them in courts, there are arbitration lawyers representing parties before the arbitrator to speak for their clients.

Third party

In both the cases, apart from parties subject to dispute, there is a neutral third party specifically assigned with the duty to resolve the matter. 

Expected Outcome

Regardless of whether it is arbitration or litigation proceedings, one party wins while the other loses out on the claims regarding dispute.

Execution

Once the decision comes in both litigation and arbitration, the task of execution has to be taken care of by the state authorities only.

 

Concluding Remarks

Both arbitration as well as litigation seek to uphold justice by following the applicable laws. The system of litigation is traditionally established by the state itself. While arbitration mostly becomes the private affair of the parties concerned, the state promotes convenience throughout the process. Hence, the state is not totally disconnected from the arbitration procedure. The idea is speedy resolution of disputes without strict procedural pathways. That is why people associated with the justice system bat for alternative dispute resolution since it is more convenient and holds the potential to reduce the burden of courts fairly.

Written By:
Abhimanyu  Shandilya

Recommended Free Legal Advices
question markSole Arbitrator passed an Ex-parte Award 2 Response(s)
Dear Client The law provides the option to appeal against the arbitration and that is possible by appealing to the high court. Since the award is already made you will have to tread your path carefully. If you are going to settle this then ensure that the credit card company is not taking the arbitration award for execution.
question markPREMISES LEASE & ARBITRATION 5 Response(s)
If the parties insert an arbitration clause in the contract and specifically name a person to act as the arbitrator, it will be valid and binding under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ever after expiry.
question markArbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 3 Response(s)
Dear If the arbitration agreement specifies the jurisdiction of a particular country's courts for disputes related to the seat of arbitration, then the courts of that specific country would have the authority to decide the issue. If the arbitration agreement is silent on the issue of the seat of arbitration, then it may be determined based on the facts and circumstances of the case, including factors such as the intention of the parties, the location of the hearings, the governing law of the contract, and other relevant factors. It is essential for parties involved in international commercial contracts to have a clear and well-drafted arbitration agreement that includes provisions regarding the seat of arbitration and the governing law. This can help avoid potential conflicts and uncertainties in the event of a dispute. In case of any ambiguity or disagreement, seeking legal advice from experienced professionals in the field of international arbitration law is highly recommended. They can provide guidance on the appropriate jurisdiction and legal processes for resolving such disputes.
question markBreach of Offer Letter Terms : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 1 Response(s)
Dear Client As you said that you have already get them know that you are declining there offer and they acknowledged that also. If they have not spent any training charges on you then the company cannot go for arbitration process. Hope, it helps.
question markRecovery - Service Matter 6 Response(s)
Dear Client, Case details are required to give any legal opinion. with the sketchy information it is difficult as the Employee had already died. So we need to see everyting from beginning to end to say some thing which is legal. Shanti Ranjan Behera, Advocate