Lock in period Lock in period

4 months ago

Hi!
I had a small question.

Recently terminated from their job and facing financial constraints, the individual, residing in Gurgaon, is in a property with a 6-month lock-in period as per the rental agreement. Having lost their job in the 4th month, they've been paying rent until now but wish to vacate due to the inability to cover the next 2 months' rent. The landlord, holding a one-month security deposit, insists on payment for the remaining two months. In this situation, what actions can the individual take?

Does section 56 of contract act applies in such situation? Can i claim security back?

Abhimanyu Shandilya

Responded 4 months ago

View All Answers
A.Dear client,
The terms of the agreement are to be studied. Consult an advocate for the same.
Generally,the landlords deduct the expenses / damages made by the tenant from that security deposit.
As per your agreement if you had the liability to pay for 6 months as a lock period, then you have to pay or else the terms of the tenancy is being violated.
Mutually, you can solve the same keeping aside the agreement, if both the parties agree
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Anik

Responded 4 months ago

View All Answers
A.Dear client
Check if your rental agreement specifies a notice period that you are required to provide before vacating the property. This is typically mentioned in rental agreements and can vary. Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act deals with the doctrine of frustration. In certain situations, a contract may become void if it becomes impossible to perform due to an unforeseen event. However, the application of this section can be complex. Communicate with your landlord about your situation. Explain the financial constraints due to job loss and inquire if they would be open to negotiating the terms, such as accepting the one-month security deposit as the settlement for the remaining two months.
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Legal Counsel Vidhikarya

Responded 4 months ago

View All Answers
A.Dear Client,
Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act deals with the doctrine of frustration. Section 56 has three limbs, under the first limb, it declares an agreement to do an act impossible in itself as void. Under the second limb, it renders the contract void on account of a subsequent event that the promisor could not prevent, thereby rendering the performance of the contract either impossible or unlawful. Under the third limb, the promisor is fastened with the liability of payment of compensation to the promisee for the loss suffered by him, if the promisor knew or with reasonable diligence, he might have known which the promisee does not know, that performance of the contract would be impossible or unlawful. As per Section 31 of the Indian Contract Act, Contingent contracts are contracts that are dependent upon the happening or non-happening of the uncertain future event. In other words, the right created under Contingent Contracts may be one which parties agree shall be enforceable only on the happening of some future event, as to which neither of the parties makes any promise and which is, therefore collateral to the contract, its import being merely to mark the moment at which a right created by the contract becomes enforceable. The applicability of Section 32 or Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, hinges upon the fact as to whether the parties have contemplated the liabilities arising out of the occurrence of the change to an existing situation/event or not. But in the absence of any clause explicitly contained in the rent agreement you can not claim its enforcement in the present situation. A dispute between a tenant and landowner is resolved under the state-specific Rent Control Act under which a Rent Controller or Addl Rent Controller is appointed to deal with the dispute arising out of a rent agreement between the parties. So, in the prevailing situation, you can file an application explaining your grievance before the concerned Rent Controller to resolve the issue amicably.
Helpful
Helpful
Share

Post Your Matter Post Your Matter

Talk to a Lawyer Talk to a Lawyer

Ask a question Ask a question

Vidhi Samaadhaan Vidhi Samaadhaan

Read Related Answers

question iconExcess land not in record, can it be sold??
Dear Client, It is illegal to sell the excess land without the patta papers and title deed. The excess land can be sold, only if the seller is the title holder of all the land including the excess. So...
question iconLeave & Liscence agreement
Dear Sir, You cannot stop basic necessities of such tenanted house which is illegal as per law. The proceedings before the Courts cannot be taken away by mutual agreement also. You have to file a suit...
question iconLandlord/Tenant
Dear Client, If the owner continues to delay or refuses to comply, you may need to explore legal options. Filing a case in court could be the next step to seek resolution and potentially recover you...
question iconLandlord/tenant
Dear Client, If the builder/ broker has not delivered the possession even after the the due date as mentioned in the contract you have a few legal options, one is to cancel the agreement with the bui...
question iconNo return of advance paid. Absence of agreemnt
Dear Client, Many landlords in India follow the system of no return off advance system. Please check the terms and conditions of the contract. if the same is not mentioned and there is no restriction...