Regarding forensic dna expert opinion
1 month ago
We want to know whether DNA report made by indian forensic genetics expert & international forensic genetics expert have same value in eyes of law or not ? We all know science is 100% based on fact . But if still discrepancy arises , court will rely on whom ? ... Indian or foreign DNA expert ?
Thank you
A.Dear Client,
DNA evidence is highly regarded for its accuracy and is considered one of the most reliable forms of evidence in court. Studies have demonstrated its accuracy at around 99%, making it a powerful tool in legal proceedings. The admissibility of DNA reports is recognized under Section 45 of the Evidence Act, 1872, which acknowledges certain facts as more precise and scientific, and thus admissible as expert evidence.
Just like fingerprints, every individual's DNA is unique, and the chances of two people having the exact same DNA profile are extremely low. Mistakes in DNA testing are rare and typically occur due to human error. A legal DNA test involves the admissibility of the test report in the legal system, and this is typically achieved through corroborative evidence from experts who conducted the tests.
The introduction of DNA evidence in a legal case can significantly impact its outcome, providing crucial information about relationships, identities, and other aspects relevant to the case. Courts often consider DNA evidence to be highly reliable and persuasive, reinforcing its importance in the justice system.
DNA evidence is highly regarded for its accuracy and is considered one of the most reliable forms of evidence in court. Studies have demonstrated its accuracy at around 99%, making it a powerful tool in legal proceedings. The admissibility of DNA reports is recognized under Section 45 of the Evidence Act, 1872, which acknowledges certain facts as more precise and scientific, and thus admissible as expert evidence.
Just like fingerprints, every individual's DNA is unique, and the chances of two people having the exact same DNA profile are extremely low. Mistakes in DNA testing are rare and typically occur due to human error. A legal DNA test involves the admissibility of the test report in the legal system, and this is typically achieved through corroborative evidence from experts who conducted the tests.
The introduction of DNA evidence in a legal case can significantly impact its outcome, providing crucial information about relationships, identities, and other aspects relevant to the case. Courts often consider DNA evidence to be highly reliable and persuasive, reinforcing its importance in the justice system.
Helpful
Helpful
Share
A.Dear Client,
Studies have shown that DNA evidence is 99% accurate, making it one of the most foolproof pieces of evidence you can use in court. DNA Report is part of admissible expert evidence under Section 45 of the Evidence Act, 1872 which is more precise and scientific. Like fingerprints, no two people have the same DNA. If a mistake occurs, it's typically because of human error. DNA evidence can greatly alter the outcome of a case. A legal DNA test demands the admissibility of the test report in the legal systems and court through corroborative evidence from experts who carried out the tests.
Studies have shown that DNA evidence is 99% accurate, making it one of the most foolproof pieces of evidence you can use in court. DNA Report is part of admissible expert evidence under Section 45 of the Evidence Act, 1872 which is more precise and scientific. Like fingerprints, no two people have the same DNA. If a mistake occurs, it's typically because of human error. DNA evidence can greatly alter the outcome of a case. A legal DNA test demands the admissibility of the test report in the legal systems and court through corroborative evidence from experts who carried out the tests.
Helpful
Helpful
Share
A.Dear Sir,
It depends upon various factors. Further, the reports of both the experts will have to be get marked before the Court and they must be summoned either in person or through video call for cross examination to complete the process. Thus, the Trial Court decide which evidence is to be relied upon depending upon the experience and explanations given by both the experts which are convincible to the Court.
It depends upon various factors. Further, the reports of both the experts will have to be get marked before the Court and they must be summoned either in person or through video call for cross examination to complete the process. Thus, the Trial Court decide which evidence is to be relied upon depending upon the experience and explanations given by both the experts which are convincible to the Court.
Helpful
Helpful
Share
Read Related Answers
Police call demanding money
Dear Client,
To verify the veracity of the call, you need to contact the concerned police station or the State headquarters police control room, and based on the information if accessed from the sourc...
Working in Central Govt Job
Dear Client,
According to Section 377 of the IPC, if any person, against the order of nature, voluntarily performs carnal intercourse with any man, woman, or animal, then that person is said to have...
Cheating
Dear Client,
Any physical relationship which was established out of the false promise of marriage amounts to rape under section 376 of the IPC. From the fact what you are suggesting is one can assume...
love affair
Dear Client,
In situations where a promise of marriage is made and subsequently reneged upon after a physical relationship, it can be emotionally challenging. While the legal options available depend...
Sexual harassment
Dear Client,
If the victim is a minor, handling the case with utmost sensitivity and confidentiality is crucial. Start by reporting the incident to the appropriate law enforcement authorities or child...
Read Blogs on Sex Crime
Sex Crime Lawyers
Find Lawyers by Location
